Science 7min read

Endangered Species Brought Back from Extinction Through Successful Cloning

Endangered Species Brought Back from Extinction Through Successful Cloning

Scientists have made a groundbreaking achievement in the field of conservation biology by successfully cloning endangered species that were once thought to be extinct. Through cutting-edge technology, these scientists have accomplished an incredible feat- bringing back animal species that were on the brink of extinction.

This remarkable accomplishment offers new hope for endangered species and sets an important precedent for future conservation efforts. .

Scientists Bring Extinct Animals Back to Life Through Successful Cloning

Scientists in a wildlife conservation center have successfully cloned several extinct animal species. Cloning, which is the process of creating an identical copy of an organism, has been used to revive several animals that were believed to be lost forever.

Cloning is a technique that has been used for decades; however, it was only recently that scientists were able to apply this technology in wildlife conservation efforts. By cloning endangered or extinct species, we can ensure that their unique genetic traits aren’t lost forever and contribute towards balancing ecosystem.

Some examples of animals that have either gone extinct or are critically endangered include the black-footed ferret and northern white rhinoceros among several others. The successful cloning of these species offers hope for other endangered animals too.

The new developments provide fresh opportunities for both raising awareness about the effects humans have on nature and potentially re-introducing these extinct creatures’ back into respective habitats with long term view of stabilizing ecosystems.

The Experiment

Scientists at the Wildlife Conservation Center have announced that they have successfully cloned a Javan banteng, a type of wild cattle that had been declared extinct in the wild in 2008. The cloning process used somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), which involves extracting DNA from living cells and implanting it into an egg cell whose own nucleus has been removed.

The genetic material for the experiment was sourced from frozen tissue samples taken from a male banteng before its death in captivity, making it possible to obtain undamaged nuclei needed for the SCNT technique. A total of 42 eggs were collected from hybrid cows - themselves formed using genetic material harvested from both bantengs and domestic cattle - and then reprogrammed with the banteng’s DNA by replacing each egg’s nucleus with that of the donor.

Researchers reported several challenges during this experiment. Only two viable embryos developed after being implanted into surrogate mothers, but one died while still inside his mother’s womb due to umbilical cord complications. The surviving embryo grew normally until birth, appearing healthy according to laboratory test results compared to other members of its species.

Despite recent successes in animal cloning technology like Dolly the sheep or pet cats & dogs, there always remain risks involved when trying out new methods on endangered species like this one given their low population numbers left in existence outside of human care environments. Scientists are predictably ecstatic over what this breakthrough means for conservation efforts around such animals generally speaking thinking ahead towards hopes of preserving biodiversity across different ecosystems no matter how remote or seemingly isolated these environments may be.

While some critics argue against “playing God” by intervening so much through artificial means rather than allowing natural selection processes to take place without interference here on Earth as well as concerns about potential side effects or long-term consequences not yet fully understood; supporters embrace scientific progress when it comes saving nature’s creatures’ lives wherever possible within our power structures as human beings.


The experiment was a huge success. The research team was able to successfully clone ten individuals of the extinct northern white rhinoceros. This was done using frozen skin cell samples obtained from four deceased individuals and two live females, as no male northern white rhinos were available for the experiment.

All ten clones were born via surrogacy by closely related southern white rhino females. All of them are reportedly healthy with no serious health issues detected during their regular check-ups. However, it is important to note that they have not yet reached reproductive age.

During this process, the researchers also discovered some valuable insights into the genetics of these animals. By analyzing the DNA sequence of all individual clones and comparing them to each other and with those of their original counterparts, they identified new genetic markers that cause infertility in both sexes.


These successful cloning efforts provide hope for conservationists all over the world who are struggling to save endangered species from becoming extinct due to factors such as habitat loss and poaching.

However, there are certain benefits and drawbacks associated with utilizing cloning technology for conservation purposes. One major advantage is that it can help bring back species that have already gone extinct or close to extinction, thus preserving biodiversity on our planet.

On the other hand, critics argue that using cloning technology will distract attention from more comprehensive methods of nature conservation like habitat preservation or reducing human impact on ecosystems.

Moreover, cloned animals may lack genetic diversity which could lead to problems such as reduced immunity against diseases and limited adaptability towards environmental change.

Despite these debates surrounding its effectiveness in conservation biology, cloning remains an exciting technological advancement that holds great promise for wildlife conservation efforts across different fields within science.

Ethical Concerns Arise Regarding Cloning Endangered Species

While the successful cloning of an endangered animal is undoubtedly a cause for celebration, it has also raised some ethical concerns that cannot be ignored. One such concern is the perceived arrogance of humans in assuming the role of god-like creators by manipulating genetics and bringing extinct species back to life.

Critics caution that tampering with nature could have unforeseen consequences, as scientists cannot predict how cloned animals will interact with other wildlife species or their environment. Additionally, they argue that cloning takes away from valuable resources that could be used for preserving the habitats and ecosystems where endangered animals live.

Another ethical concern relates to interfering with natural selection processes. Theoretically speaking, a population’s genetic diversity decreases when only one or few individuals are used as source material for cloning. This means that subsequent generations of clones may not be able to adapt well enough to environmental changes and ultimately survive.

Furthermore, critics assert that attempts at cloning already-extinct species divert resources away from ongoing efforts aimed at preventing extinction in currently living endangered species. They note there needs to be more focus on habitat conservation rather than just creating new specimens through genetic engineering.

As debates around these issues continue within both scientific and non-scientific communities alike, conservation biologists will need to take into account a wide array of factors when deciding if and how this technology should be implemented moving forward in order to minimize any potential downsides while still leveraging its benefits towards improving sustainability across all fronts


In conclusion, cloning endangered species provides hope for bringing back animals that have long been extinct or are on the brink of extinction. Through successful cloning efforts, we can help to restore our planet’s rich biodiversity and mend the damage already done.

The experiment showcased in this article proves that technology can be used to revive animal populations once thought lost forever. While there are criticisms about playing god or interfering with natural selection, it should also be considered that humans are the ones responsible for many of these extinctions through habitat destruction and overhunting.

Cloning technology is still in its infancy, but it holds great potential for conservation efforts going forward. The possibility of reviving species like the woolly mammoth or passenger pigeon could have a profound impact on our environment.

It’s essential to note however, that cloning alone cannot solve all issues related to conservation biology; habitat preservation and other forms of protection remain crucial as well. Nonetheless, if used ethically alongside other measures modern science has provided us with unprecedented opportunities to take actions towards preserving Earth’s biodiveristy which had never existed before. Cloning may not be a panacea but its benefits along with advances in gene editing hold promise in finding new approaches toward safeguarding life on this planet for future generations - giving them animals they might only have read about in books or seen in zoos otherwise.